Legislature(2017 - 2018)
2017-05-01 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2017-05-01 House Journal Page 1289 HB 76 The following, which was advanced to third reading from the April 28 calendar (page 1265), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 76(FSH) "An Act relating to the mariculture revolving loan fund and loans and grants from the fund; and providing for an effective date." Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 76(FSH) be returned to second reading for the specific purpose of considering Amendment No. 1. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 5, line 28: Delete "11" Insert "5" Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Ortiz objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 76(FSH) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 17 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Eastman, Johnson, Johnston, Knopp, Kopp, Millett, Neuman, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson 2017-05-01 House Journal Page 1290 Nays: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. CSHB 76(FSH) was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall CSHB 76(FSH) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 76(FSH) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 26 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Westlake, Wool Nays: Birch, Eastman, Johnson, Knopp, Kopp, Neuman, Rauscher, Reinbold, Saddler, Sullivan-Leonard, Talerico, Thompson, Tilton, Wilson And so, CSHB 76(FSH) passed the House. Representative Tuck moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 76(FSH) Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 35 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Birch, Chenault, Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fansler, Foster, Gara, Grenn, Guttenberg, Johnson, Johnston, Josephson, Kawasaki, Kito, Knopp, Kopp, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeDoux, Millett, Neuman, Ortiz, Parish, Pruitt, Rauscher, Saddler, Seaton, Spohnholz, Stutes, Talerico, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Westlake, Wool 2017-05-01 House Journal Page 1291 Nays: Eastman, Reinbold, Sullivan-Leonard, Tilton, Wilson And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 76(FSH) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.